Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you'll discover that in several cases, where by one of them is listed the other are going to be also. Also, you will find there is a fairly regular romance concerning them in regards to mentioned loads.
I've employed H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There aren't lots of cartridges that I use it for as I appear always to gravitate to other powders. Having said that, I can not say that it would not work. It is simply that Several other powders perform much better for your presented cartridge. For example, during the 280, H4831 gave me very good velocity and really fantastic teams with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally far better in accuracy, however the velocity was nearly identical.
It is really probable that no even more discussion is necessary, through which case we endorse starting up a brand new thread. If nonetheless you feel your reaction is required it is possible to nonetheless achieve this.
With all the 154 grain Hornady SP inside the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic teams and excellent velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a considerably increased velocity and provides marginally improved accuracy. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally far better. For that reason, in Each individual of those scenarios I went with another powder, but I would certainly detest to divest myself on the H4831.
The only difference as I realize it would be that the SC was meant to function by way h4831sc load data of powder actions much better (which it does). The for a longer time grains will not feed perfectly whatsoever in certain measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Due to the fact there would not look like any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can some of you provide a place to begin with this mix and matters to think about when Functioning this Load up?
i've applied the two and used the very same costs and possess not been capable of convey to any noticable variances with effectiveness. the SC version meters slightly smoother is about all. any feedback??
In actual fact, It really is even a smart idea to back down and operate up properly once you go from a person good deal to a different great deal h4831sc of a similar powder.
WA I'd endorse a slower burner that could give far better circumstance density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you might be loading heavies long.
Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain sizing, h4831 vs h4831sc consequently, the designation SC or limited Slice. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to movement with the powder actions far more efficiently, assisting to reduce the frequent chopping of granules.
Kansas Town, MO I'd grab regardless of what is offered at the moment. I’ve used both equally even though with my go to load and didn’t see nearly anything distinct performance clever.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a constrained source of Varget, as well as a ton much more readily available H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Nearly solely, for the reason that that's exactly what the rifles shoot the most beneficial.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but had far better pace and accuracy with H1000. I'd fairly make use of a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.
If I have a pound or two of a powder and obtain far more of a similar, only a different good deal variety, I'll combine all of them up to make sure that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.